WFP receives UK aid to support vulnerable families in Sudan

KHARTOUM— The United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) in Sudan recently received some 6 million British pounds from the UK Aid to support vulnerable families in the country.

“This flexible funding will enable WFP to provide emergency food and cash assistance to vulnerable Sudanese families who are food insecure,” the WFP said in a statement.

“It will also go toward providing school meals for girls and boys in primary schools in areas affected by conflict and disaster,” the statement added.

Some 9.8 million people in Sudan face acute food insecurity, about a quarter of its population, according to independent international analysis.

According to the WFP, its funding shortfalls are estimated at 310 million dollars.

Source: NAM NEWS NETWORK

IGAD to mediate talks to end Sudan’s transition crisis

Workneh Gebeyehu IGAD Executive Secretary Monday revealed the purpose of his visit to Khartoum was to discuss with the Sudanese stakeholders the mediation they plan to launch to end the current crisis.

He discussed with Abdel Fattah al-Burhan Head of the Transitional Sovereign Council (TSC) the role that the East African bloc would play in the resolution of the Sudanese crisis.

Also, he met with his deputy Mohamed Hamdan Daglo “Hemetti”, the National Uma Party (NUP) and some political groups supporting the coup d’état of October 25, 2021.

I “Met the Chair of the TSC SUDAN Gen Abdel Fattah al-Burhan to review developments in (the) Flag of Sudan and the role IGAD will play towards negotiated solutions to the current political crisis through constructive engagement,” he wrote in a tweet posted after the meeting with the head of the Sovereign Council.

Also, after his meeting with Hemetti, Gebeyehu told reporters he discussed with the Sudanese senior official “What is the best way to resolve the challenges the people of Sudan are facing”.

He further said they will brief the African Union about the outcome of their consultations in Khartoum and after that, they would launch an IGAD-led process.

“IGAD will play a constructive and impartial role to resolve the challenges the people of Sudan are facing,” he stressed.

The presence of Ismail Wais IGAD Special Envoy for South Sudanese Ismail Wais in Gebeyehu’s delegation suggests that he would be the chief mediator of this process.

The UNITAMS initiative to facilitate a dialogue between the Sudanese parties was welcomed by the international community particularly the Troika and the EU. But the African Union and the IGAD kept silent over the UN plan.

In a recent statement released on January 25, 2022; the African Union Peace and Security Council (PSC) clearly distanced itself from the UNITMAS’s initiative.

The PSC “Notes all international efforts aimed at finding a sustainable solution to the current crisis in Sudan, including the initiative of the (UNITAMS), and stresses the need for the African Union to coordinate the international community efforts in Sudan in order to harmonize efforts aimed at resolving the crisis in Sudan”.

The Council also urged to accompany Sudan during its transition, including through the efforts of the Chairperson of the AU Commission and IGAD.

The IGAD Executive Secretary on Monday met with the UNITAMS head and the Troika envoys in Khartoum.

“We affirmed (our) support (to) the efforts of the Sudanese people to find a comprehensive lasting solution to the current prevailing political situation,” he posted in a separate tweet after the meeting.

Sudan Tribune learnt that some groups of the Forces for Freedom and Changes declined Gebeyehu’s request for individual meetings with the coalition forces preferring a meeting with the FFC groups.

The IGAD’s initiative is perceived by some political groups as an attempt to torpedo the UNITAMS-led process.

Source: Sudan Tribune

Sudan boycotts UN rights meeting over dismissed ambassador

The UN Human Rights Council in Geneva has postponed the examination of Sudan’s human rights record to Wednesday instead of Tuesday, February 1, 2022.

The council’s decision came hours after the boycott of the session by the Sudanese government to protest the accreditation of a pro-democracy ambassador dismissed by Gen al-Burhan for his rejection of the coup of January 25, 2021.

“Sudan’s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Working Group for the third time on Wednesday, 2 February 2022, in a meeting that will be webcast live,” said the UNHRC on Tuesday.

This review marks the end of the UPR third cycle. Sudan’s first and second UPR reviews took place in May 2011 and May 2016.

In a statement extended to the Sudan Tribune on Tuesday, the National Human Rights Commission in Khartoum said they would not take part in the process and would not cooperate with its outcome.

“The UPR Working Group’s continued accreditation of the former Sudanese Representative to the United Nations Office and international organizations in Geneva, Ali Ibn Abi Talib, after dismissal, is a clear violation of Sudan’s sovereignty,”

Ben Abi Talib was among twelve ambassadors that al-Burhan dismissed from office for supporting anti-coup protests. Before to leave the former Prime Minister Hamdok struggled to keep them but al-Burhan obstructed his efforts.

The UNHRC said in a statement on Tuesday that Howaida Ali, Undersecretary of the Ministry of Justice would lead the delegation of Sudan for Wednesday meeting.

The three-country representatives serving as rapporteurs for the review of Sudan are Gambia, Marshall Islands, the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland.

The review will be based on the national report prepared by the Sudanese government, reports of independent human rights experts and groups and information provided by other stakeholders including national human rights institutions, regional organizations and civil society groups.

Source: Sudan Tribune

Covid-19: WHO warns of Covid medical waste threat

GENEVA— The World Health Organization warned Tuesday that the vast amount of waste produced in tackling the Covid-19 pandemic posed a threat to human and environmental health.

The tens of thousands of tonnes of extra medical waste had put a huge strain on healthcare waste management systems, the WHO said in a report.

The extra waste is “threatening human and environmental health and exposing a dire need to improve waste management practices”, the UN health agency said.

As countries scrambled to get personal protective equipment (PPE) to cope with the crisis, less attention was paid to disposing of Covid-19 health care waste safely and sustainably, the WHO said.

The report looked at the 1.5 billion units — approximately 87,000 tonnes — of PPE procured between March 2020 and November 2021, and shipped out to countries via the United Nations system — a small fraction of the global total.

Most of this equipment has likely ended up as waste, the WHO said.

“It is absolutely vital to provide health workers with the right PPE. But it is also vital to ensure that it can be used safely without impacting on the surrounding environment,” said WHO emergencies director Michael Ryan.

Furthermore, over 140 million test kits have been shipped, with the potential to generate 2,600 tonnes of mainly plastic, non-infectious waste and 731,000 litres of chemical waste.

Approximately 97 percent of plastic waste from tests is incinerated, the report said.

And the first eight billion Covid-19 vaccine doses administered globally produced 144,000 tonnes of additional waste such as syringes, needles and safety boxes.

The WHO does not recommend using gloves for vaccine injections but the report said it appeared to be common practice.

Gloves, in terms of volume, constitute the greatest proportion of PPE waste of all items procured by the UN, the report said.

The 71-page report warned that safe management services for healthcare waste were lacking even before the pandemic added further pressures.

The latest available data, from 2019, suggested that one in three healthcare facilities globally did not safely manage healthcare waste — and in the 46 least-developed countries, more than two in three facilities did not have a basic healthcare waste management service.

“This potentially exposes health workers to needle stick injuries, burns and pathogenic microorganisms, while also impacting communities living near poorly-managed landfills and waste disposal sites through contaminated air from burning waste, poor water quality or disease-carrying pests,” the WHO said.

The report recommended practical solutions, such as using PPE more rationally; using less packaging; developing reusable PPE; using PPE made with biodegradable materials; investing in non-burn waste treatment technology; centralising waste management; and investing in local PPE production.

“Addressing environmental concerns does not necessitate compromising on safety,” it said.

Source: NAM NEWS NETWORK